Thursday, June 2, 2016

That Loony Myth about Lunar Dust

history channel documentary hd Creation Research Society Quarterly, December, 1973, p.174 says, "The decimation and the loss of comets puts a positive maximum utmost on the age of the nearby planetary group. Rather than 4,5 billion years, it shows up at the most to be just a couple to a few thousand years of age."

Before they sent men to the moon, NASA was worried around one of the alleged "evidences" the evolutionists use for their "4,6 billion year old universe." These evolutionists accepted (and obviously demanded educating our researchers and understudies) that the dust on the moon was "a few miles" profound as a result of the disintegration of the moon surface "over billions of years" because of the ultra-violet light and X-beams from the sun. They said that this dust had been collecting at a rate of 2 to 5 thousandth of an inch for every year. As indicated by them, there were presently hazardous floats of delicate dust gathered all over the place on the moon's surface.

Isaac Asimov trusted that the dust could be "many feet profound" and in spots "50 feet profound or more." The accompanying words terrified the men at NASA when he said, "I get a photo, thusly, of the primary space ship, selecting a decent level spot for landing purposes, coming gradually descending tail-first and sinking superbly outside of anyone's ability to see" (Asimov's own paper - 1958).

No comments:

Post a Comment