In the Monthly Notice of the Royal Astronomical Society

history channel documentary hd In the Monthly Notice of the Royal Astronomical Society of London, V115, pp 585-644, Lyttleton (an evolutionist) talks about the X-beams and UV light striking the uncovered moon rocks. He trusted that they "could amid the age of the moon (which he clearly accepted to be "millions" of years old) be adequate to frame a layer over it a few miles profound."

Goodness truly? All things considered, we should see what they found on Apollo's first moon landing: Surprise of all astonishments; there was one and only half creep of dust by and large on the moon's surface! Presently listen painstakingly: They actually left stainless steel plates there and on their arrival they gauged the measure of dust that had gathered on them. NASSA's figurings demonstrated that at the rate they discovered, they would gather just 2,7 inches of dust for each million years! Tragically, and unfortunately (and obviously to the aggregate humiliation of our development companions) that works out to be 1033 feet of dust in 4,6 billion years and not the one half crawl they really found! Furthermore, all the more essentially (and obviously to be noted with pompous fulfillment) this information focuses to the way that the age of the moon can't be more than 4000 to 6000 years at most! Also, pssst: as per the Genesis record (which is in your Bible as well) the moon is just three days more youthful than the earth.